4 Comments

I loved this, Haley, which uncannily chimes well with my re-reading of Joan Didion's 'Blue Nights' this weekend, which I am reading in preparation for Petya's project. I am finding it a harder read than when I first encountered it years ago, and I had to sit a while and give it some thought. I realised it is around the ways in which I myself have changed and the personal life experiences I am bringing to my close read.

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by haley larsen, phd

Beautiful! What I love about this, along with closely reading in general, is being open to the possibilities. We allow ourselves the room to grow and discover new things in a text, including lightbulb moments regarding our perceptions…whether they’ve changed or stayed the same. I’ve always loved being in communion with curious readers. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Sep 16Liked by haley larsen, phd

Yes, yes, and more yes. I LOVE this! I think closely reading, especially if you annotate is also another way to enter into a conversation with the text AND yourself. I'm doing a re-read of The Artist's Way and it's fascinating what I highlighted/circled, etc. that first time versus now, years and years later. It's forcing me to ask myself, is this still true? Is this what I still believe? And if not, what has changed? How have I changed? And how has this text changed with or against who I've become?

Expand full comment
author

Yes! I 100% believe that annotation is a mode of conversation. Most of how I read comes from this perspective and it allows me to say, to books that no longer resonate with me, "I'm glad we had a previous conversation, and I don't need additional ones with these ideas right now." It's such a cool way to recognize and own your own POV and needs as a reader!

Expand full comment