Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Martha Nichols's avatar

Haley, I also love these chapters in Middlemarch. With the deepening divide between Dorothea (she finally realizes she's angry!) and Casaubon, our narrator so acutely observes their inner turmoil. That "tiny speck" of self that blots out everything else — oh, yes. And as Chris notes, the scene of them walking together, which closes Book IV, is so relatable and wrenching, with Casaubon saying:

"'Come, my dear, come. You are young, and need not to extend your life by watching.'

"When the kind quiet melancholy of that speech fell on Dorothea's ears, she felt something like the thankfulness that might well up in us if we had narrowly escaped hurting a lamed creature. She put her hand into her husband's, and they went along the broad corridor together."

Wow. This is so full of layers, it took my breath away. I also like the following sentence from Chapter 40 in reference to why Mary Garth is so compelling despite her "plainness":

"A human being in this aged nation of ours is a very wonderful whole, the slow creation of long interchanging influences; and charm is a result of two such wholes, the one loving and the one loved."

There I hear the author herself — Mary Ann Evans writing as George Eliot — who was herself plain but quite compelling and fired up with intellect and sympathy for others. What I love about Eliot's work, discursive as it can get when talking about politics of the time or science, is that she does wind those social details into the lives of all these characters in a provincial town. The discussion of medical prejudices, for instance, was not unlike all the anti-science attitudes expressed now. We still get mired down with small thinking, our tiny-speck selves made to seem bigger when amplified on social media. I doubt George Eliot would have been surprised.

Expand full comment
Chris Grace's avatar

The description of Mr. Trumbull's delight and self-importance at having his vital signs recorded for science was comical - "...by learning many new words which seemed suited to the dignity of his secretions" was by far my favorite example.

The description of Casaubon's awareness of his illness and its impact on him was thought-provoking, especially the section containing the following line: "When the commonplace 'We must all die' transforms itself suddenly into the 'I must die-and soon'..." Again, George Eliot is presenting this bitter, selfish man and his underlying motives for my empathetic consideration when I just want to completely dislike him - I'm wondering if that was her goal or if she was just so skilled at developing complex characters.

The whole of Chapter 42 felt like a huge shift in Dorothea's marriage - from (still) striving to earn her husband's love and respect; to despising him; to some sort of caring that is not pity, but not romantic love either. The way Eliot describes the small things that are not small at all is incredible - she must have been such a keen observer of human nature. The description of Casaubon refusing to soften into Dorothea as they walked together and its impact on her feelings felt so relatable to me: "...it is in these acts called trivialities that the seeds of joy are ever wasted..." I'm finding that I really enjoy getting the dual perspective of the narrator and the characters - it makes their behaviors and missteps so much more poignant and heart-warming.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts